The twin towers were a completely unique design. A design that did not have the steel internal structure like every other building on the planet. This design used the exterior wall as its only support from a central core enabling the clear span of wide open spaces in the floor plan.
The biggest lie of the conspiracy theorists is that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel. Fact is heat any heat weakens steel with out having to melt it.
Conspiracy theories only works when people do not know or understand what is involved.
Con Theory #1 The buildings just turned to dust
-Wrong: The 14.6 Acre, WTC Building Site was excavated 70 feet deep giving massive space under ground level for the buildings to fall into and disappear.
Con Theory #2 The twin towers were a controlled demolition
- Wrong: There was no noise of explosions and the puffs of dust seen as each floor collapses were due to the nature of the balloon type construction where each floor would act as a bellows.
Con Theory #3 Steel melts at 2700 degrees and fuel burns at 1500 therefore the planes could not have caused the collapse.
-Wrong: Heat weakens steel at a temperature lower than 1500 degrees, and in this weakened state, steel would be unable to support the weight of 20 stories above, and once the momentum started there is not any structural material that could have stopped the falling.
Con Theory #4 the buildings should have toppled instead of coming straight down
-Wrong: The Twin Towers were of unique design they were built like a tube with a stick down the middle on which the building would slide down.
Con Theory #5 Because the twin towers were bigger they should have had a bigger impact on the seismographs than the Seattle Kingdom Controlled Demolition did.
-Wrong The fact that the seismograph shows a lesser impact than the Kingdom seems to prove no controlled demolition on any of the three buildings.
-And the manner in which the Twin Towers fell also would lessen the seismic impact.
We have not found one conspiracy theorist who is promoting Controlled Demolition to be speaking 100% of the truth.
God has a saying in the bible, you can't find grapes on a thorn bush and you won't find figs on a thistle. Meaning if there is one lie from someone none of what they say is the truth.
So why would anyone lie about this or anything like it. Well how many scientists jumped on board with the lie of the climate change issue?? Why?? Follow the real money! NWO!
Well the WTC issue that should be explored and is avoided, is how did Clinton admin organize illegals to come into America and join with other muslims here, get the training to fly and let them slip under the radar during the first 8 months of the Bush Admin?
And what year did the muslims become the tool of choice by the NWO to take down America?
Is that why we see the promotion of the lie of WTC controlled demolition, to take the heat off the muslim connection and find a scapegoat to throw some innuendo at?
Also the video of the flight path of the plane hitting the pentagon was not a path that any missile would take.
So many questions, the truth of which scares the NWO colluders that for 18 years they have worked on tweaking the minds of Americans to busy to search the facts and a lot of time to manufacture fake scenarios.
Building 7 fell seven hours after the Twin Towers, posing as a perfect candidate for conspiracy theories. But Building 7 has several unique characteristics that very easily explain how and why it fell the way it did.
Con Theory #6 Building 7 was a controlled Demolition